Ching‐Feng Wen

1.6k citations
184 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Feng Wen

165 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ching‐Feng Wen
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Numerical Analysis 470
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 945
  • Geometry and Topology 238
  • Modeling and Simulation 97
  • Applied Mathematics 190
Replace Joydeep Dutta with:
Joydeep Dutta India
Jein-Shan Chen Taiwan
Chong Li China
A. F. Izmailov Russia
A. Auslender France
M. Seetharama Gowda United States
Alberto Seeger France
T. Zolezzi Italy
Regina S. Burachik Australia
Philip D. Loewen Canada
Ching‐Feng Wen relative to Joydeep Dutta India Joydeep Dutta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Joydeep Dutta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Feng Wen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Feng Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Feng Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Feng Wen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Feng Wen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Feng Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Feng Wen. The network helps show where Ching‐Feng Wen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Feng Wen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Feng Wen Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Feng Wen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 184 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201868
2 201959
3 201858
4 202056
5 201740
6 202234
7 202029
8 201923
9 202123
10 202122
11 201921
12 201921
13 201318
14 201918
15 201817
16 201717
17 202114
18 201214
19 201014
20 201314

About Ching‐Feng Wen

Ching‐Feng Wen is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Geometry and Topology, Control and Systems Engineering and Applied Mathematics, having authored 184 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimization and Variational Analysis (122 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (76 papers), Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities (60 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (38 papers), Topology Optimization in Engineering (23 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (17 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (16 papers) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (470 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (945 citations), Geometry and Topology (238 citations), Modeling and Simulation (97 citations) and Applied Mathematics (190 citations). Ching‐Feng Wen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and India. Frequent co-authors include Lu-Chuan Ceng, Jen‐Chih Yao, Shih-sen Chang, Zhaowen Li, Zhenhai Liu, Gangqiang Zhang, Yongjian Liu, Yeong‐Cheng Liou, Ningxin Xie and Pengfei Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Inequalities and Applications, Optimization, The Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications, Abstract and Applied Analysis and Journal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact