Journal of Analysis and Testing

336 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 336 papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing usually cover Molecular Biology (166 papers), Materials Chemistry (108 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (98 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (123 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (55 papers) and Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Analysis and Testing are Royston Goodacre, Yun Xu, Huangxian Ju, J. G. Manjunatha, Girish Tigari, Juewen Liu, Jun‐Jie Zhu, Sergey Kucheryavskiy, Bin Hu and Chen-Zhong Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Analysis and Testing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Analysis and Testing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Analysis and Testing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Analysis and Testing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025