Defence Technology

1.6k papers and 21.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Defence Technology in the last decades have received a total of 21.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Defence Technology usually cover Aerospace Engineering (697 papers), Mechanics of Materials (670 papers) and Materials Chemistry (661 papers) specifically the topics of Energetic Materials and Combustion (476 papers), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (407 papers) and Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (233 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Defence Technology are G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Meltem Altın Karataş, Hasan Gökkaya, K. Srinivasa Rao, Ian Crouch, Dayal R. Parhi, Anish Pandey, Suchart Siengchin, A. Jagadeesh and B. K. Patle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Defence Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Defence Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Defence Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Defence Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Defence Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Defence Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Defence Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025