Family & Community History

199 papers and 360 indexed citations i.

About

The 199 papers published in Family & Community History in the last decades have received a total of 360 indexed citations. Papers published in Family & Community History usually cover History (119 papers), Economics and Econometrics (103 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (74 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (103 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (87 papers) and Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Family & Community History are Pat Hudson, Steven A. King, Jeremy Boulton, Jennifer A. Bailey, Andrew Jackson, Michael Drake, Katherine D. Watson, Christopher J. French, Fiona Hutton and Pamela Dale.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Family & Community History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Family & Community History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Family & Community History.

Countries where authors publish in Family & Community History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Family & Community History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Family & Community History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Family & Community History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025