Renaissance and Reformation

1.8k papers and 8.9k indexed citations

About

The 1.8k papers published in Renaissance and Reformation in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Renaissance and Reformation usually cover History (684 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (352 papers) and Classics (330 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (354 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (205 papers) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renaissance and Reformation are Natalie Zemon Davis, J. Michael Hayden, Trevor Cook, David Cast, Michael Baxandall, Ann M. Blair, Christopher Ivic, Anthony Raspa, Mark Konnert and John Considine.

In The Last Decade

Renaissance and Reformation

779 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Renaissance and Reformation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Renaissance and Reformation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renaissance and Reformation.

Countries where authors publish in Renaissance and Reformation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renaissance and Reformation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renaissance and Reformation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renaissance and Reformation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026