Estudos Ibero-Americanos

487 papers and 534 indexed citations i.

About

The 487 papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos in the last decades have received a total of 534 indexed citations. Papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos usually cover Sociology and Political Science (196 papers), Anthropology (109 papers) and History (75 papers) specifically the topics of Brazilian Military Dictatorship and Cultural Resistance (74 papers), History of Colonial Brazil (73 papers) and Urban Development and Societal Issues (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Estudos Ibero-Americanos are Francisco Silva Noelli, Tânia Andrade Lima, Gerhard Seibert, Pedro Paulo A. Funari, Pablo Lacoste, Mariano Bonomo, Luciano Prates, Marcos Napolitano, Gustavo G. Politis and Charles E. Orser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos.

Countries where authors publish in Estudos Ibero-Americanos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Estudos Ibero-Americanos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Estudos Ibero-Americanos more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025