This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Epigenomes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Epigenomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epigenomes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Epigenomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Epigenomes.
About Epigenomes
The 252 papers published in Epigenomes in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Epigenomes usually cover Molecular Biology (206 papers), Cancer Research (37 papers), Genetics (52 papers), Aging (2 papers) and Horticulture (1 paper) specifically the topics of Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (140 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (55 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (30 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (28 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (24 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (23 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (20 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Epigenomes are Suresh Kumar, Ravikanth Nanduri, Nichapa Parasin, Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen, Martijn R. H. Zwinderman, Sara Farrona, Frank J. Dekker, Günter Vogt, Colin C. Conine and Wiesława Leśniak.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.