ENGLISH LINGUISTICS

400 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 400 papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS usually cover Language and Linguistics (324 papers), Artificial Intelligence (142 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (299 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (123 papers) and Linguistic Variation and Morphology (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS are Naoki Fukui, Hajime Ono, Haruo Kubozono, Richard S. Kayne, Nikolas Gisborne, Yoshihisa Kitagawa, Daiko Takahashi, Luigi Rizzi, Yukio Hirose and Noriko Nemoto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS.

Countries where authors publish in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ENGLISH LINGUISTICS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ENGLISH LINGUISTICS more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025