Emergency Medicine International

550 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 550 papers published in Emergency Medicine International in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Emergency Medicine International usually cover Emergency Medicine (259 papers), Surgery (159 papers) and Epidemiology (93 papers) specifically the topics of Emergency and Acute Care Studies (113 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (94 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emergency Medicine International are Mazen El Sayed, Bret A. Nicks, Daniel S. Tsze, Jonathan H. Valente, Oliver Flower, Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos, Paul Atkinson, Adrian Boyle, Ian Higginson and Thana Khawcharoenporn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Emergency Medicine International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emergency Medicine International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emergency Medicine International.

Countries where authors publish in Emergency Medicine International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emergency Medicine International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emergency Medicine International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Medicine International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025