Nationalism and Ethnic Politics

675 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 675 papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (418 papers), Political Science and International Relations (343 papers) and Demography (64 papers) specifically the topics of Political Conflict and Governance (97 papers), Political Systems and Governance (77 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics are Jeff Corntassel, John Ishiyama, Edward Schatz, C. Christine Fair, Karen Bird, Barry Sautman, Jonathan Fox, M. Hakan Yavuz, Daniele Conversi and Julie Chernov Hwang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics.

Countries where authors publish in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nationalism and Ethnic Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025