Economics and Politics

648 papers and 19.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 648 papers published in Economics and Politics in the last decades have received a total of 19.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Economics and Politics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (437 papers), Political Science and International Relations (227 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (181 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (173 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (145 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Economics and Politics are Philip Keefer, Stephen Knack, Witold J. Henisz, Arye L. Hillman, John G. Riley, Jack Hirshleifer, Barry R. Weingast, Douglass C. North, Paul Milgrom and Jakob Svensson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Economics and Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Economics and Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Economics and Politics.

Countries where authors publish in Economics and Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Economics and Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Economics and Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economics and Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025