East European quarterly

238 papers and 784 indexed citations i.

About

The 238 papers published in East European quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 784 indexed citations. Papers published in East European quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (118 papers), Sociology and Political Science (60 papers) and Cultural Studies (43 papers) specifically the topics of Balkans: History, Politics, Society (43 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (38 papers) and Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in East European quarterly are Xavier Bougarel, Andreï P. Tsygankov, Meltem Müftüler‐Baç, Steven D. Roper, Örjan Sjöberg, Lavinia Stan, John Ishiyama, Mary C. Neuburger, Alya Guseva and Stefan Toepler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in East European quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in East European quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in East European quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in East European quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in East European quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in East European quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites East European quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025