Clinical Drug Investigation

2.9k papers and 37.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation in the last decades have received a total of 37.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation usually cover Surgery (513 papers), Pharmacology (442 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (425 papers) specifically the topics of Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (179 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (151 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Drug Investigation are Diego Fornasari, Renato Vellucci, Domenico Plantone, Lesley J. Scott, Tatiana Koudriavtseva, F. Fraschini, G. Demartini, D. Esposti, Gillian M. Keating and H. Laube.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Drug Investigation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Drug Investigation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Drug Investigation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Drug Investigation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025