Journal of Borderlands Studies

962 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 962 papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (527 papers), Political Science and International Relations (514 papers) and Demography (116 papers) specifically the topics of Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (328 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (242 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Borderlands Studies are David Newman, Henk van Houtum, Tatiana Zhurzhenko, Jopi Nyman, Victor Konrad, H.J. van Houtum, Emmanuel Brunet‐Jailly, Olivier Walther, Frédéric Durand and Pertti Joenniemi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Borderlands Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Borderlands Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Borderlands Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Borderlands Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025