British Journal of Audiology

918 papers and 17.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 918 papers published in British Journal of Audiology in the last decades have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Audiology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (563 papers), Sensory Systems (287 papers) and Speech and Hearing (239 papers) specifically the topics of Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (527 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (283 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Audiology are Alf Axelsson, Anders Ringdahl, Adrian Davis, John Bamford, Quentin Summerfield, Brian R. Glasberg, Pawel J. Jastreboff, Jonathan W. P. Hazell, John Bench and Simon Stephens.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Audiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Audiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Audiology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Audiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Audiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Audiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Audiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025