Current Protocols in Neuroscience

480 papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 480 papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience usually cover Molecular Biology (232 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (187 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (102 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (46 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Neuroscience are Claudia S. Caligioni, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Mu Yang, Ashish Dhir, Sylvain Roux, Roger D. Porsolt, Gary L. Wenk, Mark A. Geyer, Paul Moser and Vincent Castagné.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025