Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols.
About Current Protocols
The 1.1k papers published in Current Protocols in the last decades have received a total of 11.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Protocols usually cover Biophysics (66 papers), Aging (19 papers), Molecular Biology (672 papers), Immunology (116 papers) and Structural Biology (8 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (89 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (66 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (58 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (55 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (54 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (48 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (46 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols are Brian L. Furman, Avi Ma’ayan, Eryk Kropiwnicki, Alexander Lachmann, Daniel J. B. Clarke, Kathleen M. Jagodnik, Sherry L. Jenkins, Allison M. Bailey, Maxim V. Kuleshov and Zhuorui Xie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.