Current Nutrition Reports

589 papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 589 papers published in Current Nutrition Reports in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Nutrition Reports usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (243 papers), Physiology (224 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (145 papers) specifically the topics of Nutritional Studies and Diet (160 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (152 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Nutrition Reports are Candice A. Myers, Seth A. Berkowitz, Edward S. Chambers, Tom Preston, Gary Frost, Douglas J. Morrison, Ilana Katz Sand, Xavier Pi‐Sunyer, Victoria M. Gershuni and Alexis C. Wood.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Nutrition Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Nutrition Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Nutrition Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Nutrition Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Nutrition Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Nutrition Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Nutrition Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025