Chinese Semiotic Studies

275 papers and 860 indexed citations i.

About

The 275 papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies in the last decades have received a total of 860 indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies usually cover Language and Linguistics (91 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (79 papers) and Philosophy (72 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (62 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (43 papers) and Translation Studies and Practices (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Semiotic Studies are Hongwei Jia, Stephen J. Cowley, Massimo Leone, Alin Olteanu, John Deely, G.R. Shi, Wing Yee Jenifer Ho, Wei Li, Noam Chomsky and Susan Petrilli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Semiotic Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Semiotic Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Semiotic Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Semiotic Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025