Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

3k citations
417 papers · · active since 1991

Impact in

Papers in

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

369 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Rehabilitation 474
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 258
  • Occupational Therapy 146
  • Pharmacology 279
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 164
Replace Rehabilitation Research and Practice with:
Rehabilitation Research and Practice United States
Advances in Physiotherapy Sweden
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies United States
Gender Medicine United States
Archives of Physiotherapy Italy
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control United States
Journal of Aging Research United States
Global Advances in Health and Medicine United States
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research United States
Stroke Research and Treatment United States
Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine relative to Rehabilitation Research and Practice United States Rehabilitation Research and Practice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rehabilitation Research and Practice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

About Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

The 417 papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 3k indexed citations . Papers published in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine usually cover Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (58 papers), Rehabilitation (40 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (32 papers), Pharmacology (48 papers) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (15 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (47 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (38 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (30 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (24 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (24 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (22 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (15 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine are Leeanne Mary Carey, Lorie Gage Richards, Dennis C. Turk, Eric Yao Chang, Virgil G. Mathiowetz, Joseph Mizrahi, Akiko Okifuji, David Yu, John Chae and Lauro S. Halstead.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact