Countries where authors publish in Crime and Justice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Crime and Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Crime and Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crime and Justice more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Crime and Justice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Crime and Justice.
About Crime and Justice
The 478 papers published in Crime and Justice in the last decades have received a total of 37.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Crime and Justice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (404 papers), Clinical Psychology (124 papers), Health (43 papers), Law (41 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (35 papers) specifically the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (264 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (221 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (86 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (72 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (43 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (35 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (27 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Crime and Justice are David P. Farrington, Ronald V. Clarke, Daniel S. Nagin, Michael Tonry, Rolf Loeber, Lawrence W. Sherman, Tom R. Tyler, Francis T. Cullen, Robert J. Sampson and Philip J. Cook.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.