Conservation Science and Practice

1.1k papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Conservation Science and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Conservation Science and Practice usually cover Ecology (653 papers), Global and Planetary Change (394 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (309 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (431 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (260 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Science and Practice are Matthew L. Forister, Emma Pelton, Scott Black, Diogo Veríssimo, David W. Macdonald, Mark W. Schwartz, Joseph Bennett, Rheinhardt Scholtz, Dirac Twidwell and Steven J. Cooke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Conservation Science and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Science and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Science and Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Conservation Science and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Science and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Science and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Science and Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025