NeoReviews

1.3k papers and 8.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in NeoReviews in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations. Papers published in NeoReviews usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (518 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (474 papers) and Surgery (315 papers) specifically the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (389 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (153 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (131 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NeoReviews are John A. Widness, Peter Rosenbaum, Alistair G.S. Philip, Alan H. Jobe, Martin Keszler, Louis P. Halamek, Gorm Greisen, Satyan Lakshminrusimha, Chantal Lau and Rose L. Molina.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NeoReviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NeoReviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NeoReviews.

Countries where authors publish in NeoReviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NeoReviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NeoReviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NeoReviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025