Assembly Automation

1.3k papers and 17.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Assembly Automation in the last decades have received a total of 17.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Assembly Automation usually cover Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (690 papers), Mechanical Engineering (326 papers) and Control and Systems Engineering (276 papers) specifically the topics of Manufacturing Process and Optimization (497 papers), Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (151 papers) and Assembly Line Balancing Optimization (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Assembly Automation are Gino Rinaldi, Robert Bogue, Jon Rigelsford, Eujin Pei, Stephen Wolfram, Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi, Bernhard Mueller, Rob Bogue, Anna Kochan and Jonathan Rigelsford.

In The Last Decade

Assembly Automation

1.1k papers receiving 14.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Assembly Automation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Assembly Automation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Assembly Automation.

Countries where authors publish in Assembly Automation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Assembly Automation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Assembly Automation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assembly Automation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026