Lucius Botes

581 citations
29 papers · 383 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Lucius Botes

27 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Lucius Botes
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Urban Studies 84
  • Business and International Management 16
  • Public Administration 25
  • Development 19
  • Law 38
Replace Ursula Grant with:
Ursula Grant United Kingdom
Diana Cammack United Kingdom
Sophie Oldfield South Africa
Alexandre Apsan Frediani United Kingdom
Nicholas Awortwi Netherlands
Ben Scully South Africa
Charles Fonchingong United Kingdom
Sanjoy Chakravorty United States
Kees Biekart Netherlands
G. Barrett Italy
Lucius Botes relative to Ursula Grant United Kingdom Ursula Grant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ursula Grant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lucius Botes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucius Botes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucius Botes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucius Botes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucius Botes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucius Botes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucius Botes. The network helps show where Lucius Botes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Lucius Botes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lucius Botes Line = papers co-authored together Lucius Botes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000267
2 200622
3
Municipal unrest in the Free State (South Africa): a new form of social movement?
200813
4 20168
5 20038
6 20097
7
Public finances, service delivery, and mine closure in Koffiefontein (Free State, South Africa): From stepping stone to stumbling block
20057
8 20216
9 20126
10
Measuring what? The utilisation of development indicators in the integrated development planning process
20086
11 20055
12 19965
13 19994
14 20113
15 20013
16 20052
17 20161
18 20111
19 20231
20
The non-payment of mortgage bonds in South Africa : the voice of defaulters : research article
20051

About Lucius Botes

Lucius Botes is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Finance, having authored 29 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Issues in South Africa (9 papers), Local Economic Development and Planning (6 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (5 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (84 citations), Business and International Management (16 citations), Public Administration (25 citations), Development (19 citations) and Law (38 citations). Lucius Botes has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lochner Marais, Peter Westoby, Thomas M. Stewart, Niamh McCrea, Helen Meekosha, Yiling Chen, Janet Newman, Manish K. Jha, André Pelser and Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe. Their work appears in journals such as Development Southern Africa, Community Development Journal, Urban Forum, The British Journal of Social Work and Acta Academica Critical views on society culture and politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact