Countries where authors publish in Coloration Technology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Coloration Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Coloration Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coloration Technology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Coloration Technology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Coloration Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Coloration Technology.
About Coloration Technology
The 1.5k papers published in Coloration Technology in the last decades have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Coloration Technology usually cover Building and Construction (863 papers), Polymers and Plastics (268 papers), Dermatology (114 papers), Analytical Chemistry (120 papers) and Organic Chemistry (317 papers) specifically the topics of Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (853 papers), Color Science and Applications (235 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (203 papers), Photopolymerization techniques and applications (143 papers), Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (133 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (112 papers), Dye analysis and toxicity (98 papers) and Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Coloration Technology are David M. Lewis, I. Holme, Robert Christie, Keith R. Millington, Mauro Banchero, Richard S. Blackburn, Idil Arslan‐Alaton, Chi Wai Kan, Peter J. Hauser and S.M. Burkinshaw.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.