Climate Dynamics

370.3k citations
8.5k papers · · active since 1986

Impact in

    • Climate variability and models
    • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
    • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
    • Cryospheric studies and observations

Papers in

    • Climate variability and models 6.8k
    • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds 258
    • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 952
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 506
    • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research 317
    • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics 235
    • Cryospheric studies and observations 170

Climate Dynamics

8.3k papers receiving 359.8k citations

Peers

Climate Dynamics
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Global and Planetary Change 246.1k
  • Atmospheric Science 116.1k
  • Oceanography 29.5k
  • Ecological Modeling 1.8k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 5.9k
Replace Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society with:
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society United States
Geoscientific model development United States
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society United Kingdom
Journal of Climate United States
Monthly Weather Review United States
Nature Geoscience United States
Environmental Research Letters United States
International Journal of Climatology China
Global and Planetary Change China
Reviews of Geophysics United States
Climate Dynamics relative to Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society United States Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Climate Dynamics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Climate Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Climate Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Climate Dynamics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Climate Dynamics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Climate Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Climate Dynamics.

About Climate Dynamics

The 8.5k papers published in Climate Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 370.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Climate Dynamics usually cover Global and Planetary Change (7.1k papers), Atmospheric Science (2.4k papers), Oceanography (630 papers), Environmental Engineering (72 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (43 papers) specifically the topics of Climate variability and models (6.8k papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (952 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (560 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (506 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (317 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (258 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (235 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Climate Dynamics are Kevin E. Trenberth, Bin Wang, G. J. Boer, Jonathan M. Gregory, James Wilson Hurrell, Filippo Giorgi, Chunzai Wang, Renguang Wu, Hervé Douville and Aiguo Dai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact