Children s Literature in Education

980 papers and 3.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 980 papers published in Children s Literature in Education in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Children s Literature in Education usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (544 papers), Sociology and Political Science (166 papers) and Education (127 papers) specifically the topics of Themes in Literature Analysis (401 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (154 papers) and Literacy, Media, and Education (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Children s Literature in Education are Lawrence R. Sipe, Frank Serafini, Maria Nikolajeva, Margaret Mackey, Sylvia Pantaleo, Thomas M. Crisp, Carole Scott, Wanda Brooks, Denise E. Agosto and Michael J. Benton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Children s Literature in Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Children s Literature in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Children s Literature in Education.

Countries where authors publish in Children s Literature in Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Children s Literature in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Children s Literature in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Children s Literature in Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025