Countries where authors publish in Comparative and Functional Genomics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative and Functional Genomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative and Functional Genomics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics.
About Comparative and Functional Genomics
The 439 papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Comparative and Functional Genomics usually cover Molecular Biology (358 papers), Genetics (78 papers), Aging (4 papers), Plant Science (71 papers) and Parasitology (9 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (100 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (71 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (62 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (59 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (58 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (31 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (27 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative and Functional Genomics are Oliver Fiehn, Alexa T. McCray, Edward R. Dougherty, Chris Mungall, Yusuf Tutar, Laurence Wurth, Francesco L. Brancia, Jo Wixon, John F. Allen and Javier Paz‐Ares.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.