Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals

4.3k citations
294 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals

269 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Safety Research 3.3k
  • Occupational Therapy 664
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Speech and Hearing 397
  • Demography 645
Replace Career Development for Exceptional Individuals with:
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals United States
Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities United States
African Journal of Disability South Africa
Autism in Adulthood United States
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Australia
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior United States
Applied and Preventive Psychology United States
Methodology United States
Journal of College Counseling United States
International Journal of Wellbeing United States
Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals relative to Career Development for Exceptional Individuals United States Career Development for Exceptional Individuals's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals.

About Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals

The 294 papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals usually cover Safety Research (270 papers), Occupational Therapy (57 papers), Demography (57 papers), Clinical Psychology (92 papers) and Education (122 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (265 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (87 papers), Education Systems and Policy (76 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (57 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (57 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (36 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (34 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals are Mary E. Morningstar, Ryan O. Kellems, Valerie L. Mazzotti, Dawn A. Rowe, Lynn Newman, David W. Test, Joseph W. Madaus, Karrie A. Shogren, Marcus Poppen and Catherine Fowler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact