Journal of College Counseling

440 papers and 7.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 440 papers published in Journal of College Counseling in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of College Counseling usually cover Social Psychology (268 papers), Clinical Psychology (221 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (89 papers) specifically the topics of Counseling Practices and Supervision (131 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (65 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of College Counseling are Eric A. Storch, Jonathan W. Roberti, Ruth Chao, Charles P. Chen, Joshua C. Watson, Benjamin D. Locke, Bruce S. Sharkin, Krista M. Soria, Ronald L. Huesman and Madonna G. Constantine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of College Counseling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of College Counseling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of College Counseling.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of College Counseling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of College Counseling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of College Counseling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of College Counseling more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025