Calidoscópio

221 papers and 261 indexed citations i.

About

The 221 papers published in Calidoscópio in the last decades have received a total of 261 indexed citations. Papers published in Calidoscópio usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (138 papers), Language and Linguistics (79 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (66 papers) specifically the topics of Linguistics and Education Research (119 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (60 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Calidoscópio are Charles Goodwin, Ana Cristina Ostermann, Daniel Cassany, Dèsirée Motta-Roth, Viviane de Melo Resende, Gíovanní Parodi, Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, Vilson J. Leffa, Vera Lúcia Menezes de Oliveira e Paiva and Celia Kitzinger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Calidoscópio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Calidoscópio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Calidoscópio.

Countries where authors publish in Calidoscópio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Calidoscópio. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Calidoscópio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calidoscópio more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025