Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook

260 papers and 200 indexed citations i.

About

The 260 papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook in the last decades have received a total of 200 indexed citations. Papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook usually cover Philosophy (147 papers), Political Science and International Relations (15 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (13 papers) specifically the topics of Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (124 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (17 papers) and Literary and Philosophical Studies (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook are Jon Stewart, C. Stephen Evans, Claudia Welz, Daniel Conway, Anthony Rudd, George Pattison, Andrew Burgess, Alastair Hannay, John D. Caputo and Hubert L. Dreyfus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook.

Countries where authors publish in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025