Cahiers québécois de démographie

466 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 466 papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie usually cover Sociology and Political Science (269 papers), General Health Professions (165 papers) and Demography (91 papers) specifically the topics of Canadian Identity and History (116 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (87 papers) and Migration, Identity, and Health (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cahiers québécois de démographie are Céline Le Bourdais, Robert Bourbeau, Marc Adélard Tremblay, Alain Bélanger, Charles Castonguay, Hélène Vézina, Bertrand Desjardins, Jacques Légaré, Jacques Ledent and Philippe Antoine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie.

Countries where authors publish in Cahiers québécois de démographie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cahiers québécois de démographie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cahiers québécois de démographie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cahiers québécois de démographie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025