Bulletin of Materials Science

5.6k papers and 72.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.6k papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science in the last decades have received a total of 72.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science usually cover Materials Chemistry (3.2k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.9k papers) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (335 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (329 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (305 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bulletin of Materials Science are P. Rodríguez, Prakash D. Mangalgiri, A.K. Mallik, C.D. Lokhande, S. V. Suryanarayana, Habib M. Pathan, C. Suryanarayana, K. C. Patil, Anindya Das and Binay Kumar Singh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science.

Countries where authors publish in Bulletin of Materials Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bulletin of Materials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bulletin of Materials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bulletin of Materials Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025