Clinical Pediatrics

8.5k papers and 101.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 8.5k papers published in Clinical Pediatrics in the last decades have received a total of 101.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Pediatrics usually cover Surgery (1.6k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.4k papers) and Epidemiology (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Health (451 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (320 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Pediatrics are Lawrence S. Neinstein, Frances Page Glascoe, Eli A. Rubinstein, F. Xavier Castellanos, Richard H. Schwartz, Wayne M. Dankner, John M. Graham, Itzhak Brook, Deepak Kamat and Victor C. Strasburger.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Pediatrics

7.5k papers receiving 85.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Clinical Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Pediatrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Pediatrics.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Pediatrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Pediatrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Pediatrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026