Botanical studies

About

The 823 papers published in Botanical studies in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Botanical studies usually cover Plant Science (493 papers), Molecular Biology (365 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (264 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (138 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (126 papers) and Plant and animal studies (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Botanical studies are Katrin Viehweger, Michael F. Fay, Edward C. Yeung, Ching‐I Peng, Tian-Ming Yen, Vinay Sharma, Nilima Kumari, Pooja Parmar, Kuo‐Fang Chung and Paulo J.C. Favas.

In The Last Decade

Botanical studies

783 papers receiving 12.6k citations

Fields of papers published in Botanical studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Botanical studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Botanical studies.

Countries where authors publish in Botanical studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Botanical studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Botanical studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botanical studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026