Countries where authors publish in Breeding Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Breeding Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Breeding Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Breeding Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Breeding Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Breeding Science.
About Breeding Science
The 1.6k papers published in Breeding Science in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Breeding Science usually cover Plant Science (1.4k papers), Horticulture (29 papers), Genetics (502 papers), Molecular Biology (458 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (68 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (432 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (244 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (233 papers), GABA and Rice Research (187 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (184 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (151 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (141 papers) and Soybean genetics and cultivation (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Breeding Science are Masahiro Yano, Masashi Hirai, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Toshiya Yamamoto, Kyuya Harada, Kaworu Ebana, Yusaku Uga, Kazuo Watanabe, Yoshimichi Fukuta and Satoshi Watanabe.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.