BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology

1.1k papers and 13.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (272 papers), Pharmacology (137 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (134 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (59 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (57 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology are Michael Aschner, Luca Parente, Maria Gustafsson, Kirsten Vistisen, Dorte Nielsen, Merete Vaage‐Nilsen, Anne Dyhl-Polk, Daiana Silva Ávila, Bayeh Abera and Mulugeta Kibret.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025