Basic Income Studies

203 papers and 1.5k indexed citations

About

The 203 papers published in Basic Income Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Basic Income Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (98 papers), Political Science and International Relations (71 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (58 papers) specifically the topics of Income, Poverty, and Inequality (58 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (57 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Basic Income Studies are Guy Standing, Philip Pettit, Erik Olín Wright, Karl Widerquist, Anca Gheaus, Yannick Vanderborght, Alex Gourevitch, Philip Harvey, Simon Birnbaum and Stuart White.

In The Last Decade

Basic Income Studies

152 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Basic Income Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Basic Income Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Basic Income Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Basic Income Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Basic Income Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Basic Income Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basic Income Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026