Cognitive Semiotics

205 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 205 papers published in Cognitive Semiotics in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Semiotics usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (114 papers), Language and Linguistics (46 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (41 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (102 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (26 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Semiotics are George Lakoff, Jordan Zlatev, Kalevi Kull, Michael Kimmel, Terrence W. Deacon, Colwyn Trevarthen, Ellen Dissanayake, Raymond W. Gibbs, Gerard J. Steen and Göran Sonesson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Semiotics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Semiotics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Semiotics.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Semiotics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Semiotics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Semiotics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Semiotics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025