Clinical and Molecular Allergy

276 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 276 papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy usually cover Immunology and Allergy (149 papers), Physiology (113 papers) and Dermatology (73 papers) specifically the topics of Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (123 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (108 papers) and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Molecular Allergy are Guha Krishnaswamy, S. David, Sebastiano Gangemi, Marco Casciaro, E. Michael Lewiecki, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Maria Teresa Ventura, Rob C. Aalberse, Ta‐Chang Lin and R. Buquicchio.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Molecular Allergy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Molecular Allergy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025