Biology of Sport

1.1k papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Biology of Sport in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Biology of Sport usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (753 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (208 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (144 papers) specifically the topics of Sports Performance and Training (692 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (454 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (204 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biology of Sport are Karim Chamari, Piotr Żmijewski, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Ismail Dergaa, Antonio Tessitore, Helmi Ben Saad, Marco Beato, Daniele Conte, Amit Bandyopadhyay and Asier Los Arcos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biology of Sport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biology of Sport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biology of Sport.

Countries where authors publish in Biology of Sport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biology of Sport. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biology of Sport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biology of Sport more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025