Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Papers
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Papers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Papers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Papers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Papers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Papers.
About Biomedical Papers
The 1.4k papers published in Biomedical Papers in the last decades have received a total of 18.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Papers usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (104 papers), Transplantation (12 papers), Surgery (153 papers), Ophthalmology (29 papers) and Oncology (82 papers) specifically the topics of Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (18 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (15 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (14 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (14 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (13 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (13 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (11 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Papers are Daniela Walterová, Miroslav Pohanka, Alena Rajnochová Svobodová, Jitka Psotová, Vladimír Křen, Pavel Anzenbacher, Eva Anzenbacherová, Jitka Ulrichová, Petra Jančová and Zák A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.