This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biologics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biologics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biologics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biologics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biologics.
About Biologics
The 517 papers published in Biologics in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Biologics usually cover Rheumatology (92 papers), Hematology (63 papers), Immunology (92 papers), Genetics (42 papers) and Oncology (95 papers) specifically the topics of Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (48 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (26 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (24 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (22 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (22 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (21 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (20 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biologics are Chad J. Creighton, Misganaw Asmamaw Mengstie, Tzyy-Choou Wu, Tafere Mulaw Belete, Alaa Badawi, Irina Petrache, Tariq I. Mughal, Timothy M. Cox, Veysel Kayser and Esteban Cruz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.