This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microscopy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Microscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microscopy.
About Microscopy
The 854 papers published in Microscopy in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Microscopy usually cover Structural Biology (324 papers), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (264 papers), Biophysics (82 papers), Radiation (96 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (146 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (324 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (259 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (72 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (72 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (68 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (63 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (33 papers) and Near-Field Optical Microscopy (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microscopy are Kazuo Ishizuka, Jingyue Liu, B. E. Allman, Fred J. Sigworth, Niklas Dellby, John E. Heuser, Fumio Watari, Shunsuke Muto, Shigeo Okabe and Masako Osumi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.