Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

39.3k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
    • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Papers in

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

1.3k papers receiving 34.8k citations

Peers

Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Comparison fields: 5 of 216
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 13.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 8.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.2k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 8.2k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.2k
Replace Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience with:
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience United States
The Neuroscientist United States
Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews United States
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine United States
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine United States
International review of neurobiology United States
Sleep Medicine Reviews United States
British Journal of Clinical Psychology United Kingdom
Neural Plasticity China
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry Germany
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback relative to Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience United States Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

About Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

The 1.4k papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback in the last decades have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (322 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (444 papers), Behavioral Neuroscience (72 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (389 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (141 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (378 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (162 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (147 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (104 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (100 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (98 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (90 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback are Joel F. Lubar, Paul M. Lehrer, Edward B. Blanchard, Evgeny G. Vaschillo, M. B. Sterman, Bronya Vaschillo, David J. Vernon, Richard Gevirtz, Ian E. Wickramasekera Ii and Sat Bir S. Khalsa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact