Countries where authors publish in Bioelectrochemistry
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioelectrochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioelectrochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioelectrochemistry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioelectrochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioelectrochemistry.
About Bioelectrochemistry
The 3.0k papers published in Bioelectrochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 78.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Bioelectrochemistry usually cover Electrochemistry (842 papers), Bioengineering (294 papers), Biotechnology (390 papers), Environmental Engineering (440 papers) and Physiology (118 papers) specifically the topics of Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1.1k papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (842 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (728 papers), Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation (434 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (385 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (296 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (294 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioelectrochemistry are Damijan Miklavčič, Lluis M. Mir, Ana Maria Oliveira‐Brett, Dake Xu, Tingyue Gu, Maria Bryszewska, Tina Batista Napotnik, Hermann Berg, Barbara Klajnert‐Maculewicz and Shengshui Hu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.