This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Basin Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Basin Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basin Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Basin Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Basin Research.
About Basin Research
The 1.6k papers published in Basin Research in the last decades have received a total of 58.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Basin Research usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (872 papers), Geology (422 papers), Geophysics (972 papers), Atmospheric Science (623 papers) and Paleontology (126 papers) specifically the topics of Geological formations and processes (869 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (619 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (600 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (577 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (379 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (360 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (139 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (134 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Basin Research are M. R. Leeder, Peter G. DeCelles, Robert L. Gawthorpe, Katherine A. Giles, Alexander L. Densmore, Philip A. Allen, Luis Pomar, Chris Paola, Joe Cartwright and Christopher Jackson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.