Countries where authors publish in BALTIC FORESTRY
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BALTIC FORESTRY. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BALTIC FORESTRY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BALTIC FORESTRY more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in BALTIC FORESTRY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BALTIC FORESTRY.
About BALTIC FORESTRY
The 403 papers published in BALTIC FORESTRY in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Papers published in BALTIC FORESTRY usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (106 papers), Insect Science (92 papers), Plant Science (166 papers), Ecology (110 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (70 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (115 papers), Forest ecology and management (93 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (80 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (50 papers), Forest Management and Policy (42 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (33 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (27 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BALTIC FORESTRY are Duncan J. Halley, Frank Rosell, Lina Straigytė, Alfas Pliūra, Gitta Jutta Langer, Vaidotas Lygis, Juha Laitila, Adomas Vitas, Edmundas Bartkevičius and Timo Kärki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.